检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周迎新 ZHOU Yingxin(College of Law and Politics,Hebei GEO University,Shijiazhuang 050031,China)
出 处:《计算机应用文摘》2025年第6期235-237,共3页
摘 要:2024年3月,“人工智能+”首次被纳入政府工作报告,标志着人工智能上升至国家战略高度。在学界,人工智能生成物著作权界定范围模糊、人工智能生成物主体归属认定困难等问题导致人工智能伦理层面存在争议。在人工智能生成物的基本理论支撑上,文章对人工智能生成物是否应被赋予著作权及著作权主体归属权益在各方分配主体间所面临的伦理问题进行了探讨,针对相应伦理问题提出了具体的法治保障制度,旨在应用理论与实践推动知识产权法的蓬勃发展。In March 2024,“AI+”was first included in the government work report,marking the rise of AI to a national strategic level.In academia,the ambiguous definition of copyright for AI generated products and the difficulty in determining the ownership of the subject of AI generated products have led to ethical controversies in the field of AI.On the basis of the basic theoretical support of AI generated products,this article explores whether AI generated products should be granted copyright and the ethical issues faced by the ownership rights of copyright subjects among various distribution entities.Specific legal protection systems are proposed for corresponding ethical issues,aiming to apply theory and practice to promote the vigorous development of intellectual property law.
分 类 号:TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70