检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜亚含 JIANG Yahan(School of Physical Education,Guangdong Technology College,Zhaoqing,Guangdong 526100,China)
出 处:《肇庆学院学报》2025年第2期91-94,共4页Journal of Zhaoqing University
摘 要:通过中国与世界男子800 m记录创造者强度训练百分比的计算数据分析与比较,发现中国与世界男子800 m竞技水平差距之大的重要原因如下:一是中国教练员在选才、基础训练中没有发挥运动员个人天赋“运动员100 m绝对速度”的优势;二是在提升运动员“专项速度耐力”过程中,中国教练员在以“强度制胜”理念下,盲目采用以生理学制定“强度”训练标准,而外国教练员采用的强度训练标准来自于运动员绝对速度与比赛速度之商的百分比,这种以运动员自身实际计算的强度标准是科学的,值得中国借鉴.Through the calculation,data analysis and comparison of the percentage of intensive training between Chinese and world male 800 m record-holders,the following important reasons for the significant gap in competitive levels between China and the world have been found.First,Chinese coaches fail to give full play to the athletes'personal talent of"100 m absolute speed"during talent selection and basic training;Second,in the process of improving athletes'"specific speed endurance",under the concept of"winning by intensity",Chinese coaches blindly adopt the"intensity"training standards based on physiology.In contrast,foreign coaches'intensity training standards are derived from the percentage of the quotient of the athletes'absolute speed and race speed.This intensity standard calculated based on the athletes'own actual situation is scientific,which is worth of Chinese coaches’reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38