蓬溪起义与南昌起义比较研究  

Comparative Study of Pengxi Uprising and Nanchang Uprising

作　　者：代秋彬 DAI Qiu-bin(Party School of Suining Municipal Committee of the CPC,Suining Sichuan 629000,China)

机构地区：[1]中共遂宁市委党校,四川遂宁629000

出　　处：《教育科学文献》2025年第3期70-74,共5页

摘　　要：蓬溪起义是红军早期将领旷继勋在四川蓬溪举行的军事起义,与举世震惊的八一南昌起义相比,旷部面临的斗争形势更为严峻,领导机构相对不够成熟,军事实力不如南昌起义声势浩大,影响力也相对限于西南地区。但蓬溪起义在加强军队中党的组织建设、锻造纪律严明的人民军队、密切联系工农群众开展群众运动方面有一些优良做法,有助于宣传革命主张,唤醒长期处于反动统治中的广大群众。虽然蓬溪起义和南昌起义都最终失利,但都推动了革命形势的发展,对于我们再思考加强党的群众工作的重要性有重要启示。The Pengxi Uprising is a military uprising held by Kuang Jixun,an early general of the Red Army,in Pengxi,Sichuan Province.Compared with the Nanchang Uprising,which shocked the whole world,Kuang was faced with a more grim situation.The leading institutions were relatively immature,the military strength was not as powerful as the Nanchang Uprising,and the influence was relatively limited to the southwest region.But the Pengxi Uprising has some good practices in strengthening the Party’s organizational construction in the army,forging a disciplined people’s army,and carrying out mass movements in close contact with the masses of workers and peasants.It helps to promote revolutionary ideas and awaken the masses who have long been in reactionary rule.Although both the Pengxi Uprising and the Nanchang Uprising ultimately failed,they promoted the development of the revolutionary situation,which has important implications for us to rethink the importance of strengthening the Party’s mass work.

关 键 词：旷继勋 蓬溪起义 南昌起义 对比 

分 类 号：D23[政治法律—政治学]