农户的保护地役权政策偏好研究——基于选择实验法的分析  

Rural Household Preferences for Conservation Easements:An Analysis Based on Choice Experiments

作  者:罗姮 叶艳妹[1] 吴亚军 LUO Heng;YE Yanmei;WU Yajun

机构地区:[1]浙江大学公共管理学院,杭州310058

出  处:《农业技术经济》2025年第3期51-64,共14页Journal of Agrotechnical Economics

基  金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“城乡区域平衡发展理念下的土地制度综合改革研究”(编号:19ZDA088)。

摘  要:本文基于钱江源国家公园体制试点区范围内及周边地区243户农户的选择实验与特征数据,运用混合Logit模型分析异质性农户对保护地役权合同属性偏好与受偿意愿。结果表明,钱江源国家公园体制试点区范围内及周边地区农户更倾向选择合同期限长、补偿金额高、提供就业与实物补偿、要求负担林地管护作为义务的保护地役权合同,且就业与实物补偿作为现金补偿的补充可有效提高农户效用水平;偏好异质性分析结果表明,性别、受教育程度与家庭收入水平等因素会影响农户的合同选择偏好。基于此,保护地役权政策应着重从提供多元化的保护地役权补偿方案、增加作为义务以强化生态责任、适当延长保护地役权合同年限等方面优化,以提升农户参与生态保护的积极性。Based on a choice experiment and characteristic data of 243 households within the Qianjiangyuan National Park and surrounding areas,a mixed logit model is applied to explore rural households’preferences for conservation easement contracts and willingness to accept.The results show that households in the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot area and its surrounding areas generally prefer conservation easement contracts with a longer contract term,a higher amount of financial payment,provisions for employment opportunities,in-kind compensation,and forest land conservation obligations.Moreover,employment and in-kind compensation,as supplements to cash compensation,can effectively enhance the utility level of rural households.The heterogeneity analysis indicates that gender,education,and household income significantly influence households’contract preferences.Consequently,conservation easement policies can be optimized in terms of providing diversified compensation schemes,incorporating obligation clauses to strengthen ecological responsibility,and appropriately extending the duration of contracts,in order to enhance the enthusiasm of households’participation in ecological protection.

关 键 词:保护地役权 国家公园 选择实验法 混合Logit模型 

分 类 号:D92[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象