检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许强 XU Qiang(Patent Examination Cooperation Tianjin Center of the Patent Ofice,CNIPA,Tianjin 300304,China)
机构地区:[1]国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作天津中心,天津300304
出 处:《专利代理》2025年第1期94-99,共6页Patent Agency
摘 要:针对部分专利申请存在权利要求冗长且创造性高度不高的问题,提出一种基于超长权利要求的创造性评述的方法:首先确定超长权利要求所属的类型,之后根据不同的类型采用各自对应的评述方式进行创造性评述。通过实际案例表明,该方法可以针对不同类型的超长权利要求灵活选取相应的评述方法,有效避免了审查员割裂技术方案和遗漏技术特征的问题,在提高审查效率的同时,也能保证审查质量,还能使创造性评述的整体结构更加清晰严谨,有助于提高审查意见通知书的效能。Aiming at the problems of lengthy claims and low inventiveness in some patent applications,this study proposes a method for evaluating inventiveness based on super-long claims.Firstly,the method determines the type of super-long claims.Then,it applies corresponding evaluation methods based on the different types to conduct inventiveness evaluation.Practical cases show that this method can flexibly select appropriate evaluation methods for different types of super-long claims,effectively avoiding examiners splitting technical solutions and missing technical features.This method also improves the efficiency of examination while ensuring the quality of examination,simultaneously makes the overall structure of inventiveness evaluation clearer and more rigorous,and enhances the effectiveness of examination notification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38