帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的教义学阐释  

The Doctrinal Interpretation of the Crime of Assisting Criminal Activities in Cyberspace

作　　者：陈杼晖 Chen Zhuhui(Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University,Nanchang 330038,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]江西科技师范大学,江西南昌市330038

出　　处：《江西科技师范大学学报》2025年第1期50-55,共6页Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University

摘　　要：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪应视为“共犯行为正犯化说”的体现。帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中的“情节严重”罪量要素是该罪的构成要件要素;应采取限缩的立场理解罪量要素中的“对象”;罪量要素中的“支付结算资金”不能混同于“流水资金”。帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中的“明知”采取狭义说观点比较妥当,也即“明知”是指知道和应当知道;对“应当知道”的认定采用“综合认定标准”缺乏规范操作规则而导致规则虚置,应当结合实践构建类型化的“综合认定标准”,形成规范化共识,避免出现规则虚置。the crime of assisting criminal activities in cyberspace should be regarded as a manifestation of the“accomplice behavior and criminalization theory”.The element of“serious circumstances”in the crime of assisting criminal activities in cyberspace is a constituent element of the crime.A restrictive stance should be adopted to understand the“object”in the elements of criminal offense.The“payment settlement funds”in the element of criminal offense cannot be confused with“running funds”.The narrow definition of“knowing”in the crime of assisting criminal activities in cyberspace is more appropriate,that is,“knowing”refers to“knowing exactly”and“should have known”.The lack of standardized operating rules for the use of“comprehensive identification standards”in the recognition of“should have known”has led to the virtualization of rules.It is necessary to combine practice to construct a typological“comprehensive identification standard”,form a standardized consensus,and avoid the occurrence of rulevirtualization.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 性质 情节严重 明知 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]