未成年人保护公益诉讼的优化进路——以《未成年人保护法》第一百零六条为中心  

Optimized Approaches to Public Interest Litigation for the Protection of Minors:Focus on Article 106 of the Law on the Protection of Minors

作　　者：何锟 HE Kun(School of Administrative Law,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710063,China)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学行政法学院,西安710063

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2025年第2期23-30,79,共9页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：未成年人保护公益诉讼制度是保护未成年人合法权益的新途径,《未成年人保护法》第一百零六条为该制度的运行提供了明确的法律依据。但目前学界并未厘清其法定内涵,仍存在未成年人合法权益受侵害的评判标准不明、未成年人保护责任主体不明、涉公共利益的判定标准未定等问题。为避免实践过程中对该条款的错误理解和适用,主张综合运用法律解释、规范分析等研究方法对合法权益进行扩大解释,同时建立主观与客观相结合的评价模式,通过构建多层级的未成年人保护体系,在具体情境中明确公共利益的内涵,从而对涉公共利益进行从宽解释,以期最大限度保护未成年人合法权益。The public interest litigation system for the protection of minors is a new way to protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors,and Article 106 of the Law on the Protection of Minors provides a clear legal basis for the operation of the system.However,at present,the academic community has not clarified its statutory connotation,and there are still problems such as unclear criteria for judging the infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of minors,unclear subject responsibility for the protection of minors,and undetermined criteria for judging public interests.To avoid misunderstanding and application of this article in practice,it is advocated to comprehensively use research methods such as legal interpretation andnormative analysis to expand the interpretation of legitimate rights and interests,and at the same time builds an evaluation model that combines subjectivity and objectivity.Additionally,it clarifies the connotation of public interests in specific situations via the construction of multi-level subjects for the protection of minors to carry out a lenient interpretation of public interest and thus protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors to the greatest extent.

关 键 词：未成年人 公益诉讼 综合司法保护 

分 类 号：D922.183[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]