检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张屹 ZHANG Yi(Hunan Academy of Social Sciences/Development Research Center of Hunan Provincial People's Government,Changsha 410003,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南省社会科学院/湖南省人民政府发展研究中心,湖南长沙410003
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期136-140,共5页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:自2016年《欧盟对华新战略要素》发布以来,欧盟持续调整对华战略。而美国在这一过程中起到了重要推动作用。在美国影响下,美欧“民主技术联盟”的组建也推动欧盟对华经济竞争持续深化。当前美欧协调机制呈现出复杂多变的特点,但总体上仍然采取共同的对华“去风险化”的立场,对中国企业和中国投资设定更高的门槛和苛刻的标准,使得抬高对华贸易政策的门槛成为美欧协调的大方向。然而这样一种协调机制背后的政治制度也在面临自身的困局。Since the release of the EU's New Strategic Elements for China in 2016,the EU has continuously adjusted its strategy towards China.The United States played an important driving role in this process.Under the influence of the United States,the establishment of the"Democratic Technology Alliance"between the United States and Europe has also promoted the continuous deepening of economic competition between the European Union and China.The current coordination mechanism between the United States and Europe presents complex and ever-changing characteristics,however,it still adopts a common stance of"de-risking"towards China as a whole,setting higher thresholds and strict standards for Chinese enterprises and Chinese investment.Raising the threshold for trade policies towards China is the generous direction of US Europe coordination.However,the political system behind such a coordination mechanism is also facing its own difficulties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26