Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation for greater occipital neuralgia evaluated using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist  

基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单评价针灸推拿治疗枕大神经痛的随机对照试验报告质量

作　　者：Liu Liguo Qiu Mingwang Huang Yanling Fan Zhiyong Wu Shan Guo Rusong 刘利国;丘明旺;黄艳玲;范志勇;吴山;郭汝松(广州中医药大学第二临床医学院,广东省广州市510405;广州中医药大学第二附属医院,广东省广州市510120)

机构地区：[1]Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,Guangdong Province,China [2]Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510120,Guangdong Province,China

出　　处：《中国组织工程研究》2025年第30期6566-6573,共8页Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(81874511),项目负责人:吴山;广东省名中医传承工作室建设项目(102018007),项目负责人:范志勇;广东省第四批名中医师承项目(102018105),项目负责人:吴山。

摘　　要：OBJECTIVE:In recent years,the number of clinical research reports on acupuncture and manipulation for the treatment of greater occipital neuralgia has gradually increased,but the quality is uneven.There is currently no literature evaluating the quality of published reports,which is not conducive to the promotion of clinical use of these therapies.Therefore,this article assessed the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation for greater occipital neuralgia.METHODS:Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),VIP,WanFang Data,and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database(CBM)from inception to May 20,2024 were searched.The reporting quality of included randomized controlled trials was independently evaluated by two investigators using the CONSORT statement,STRICTA checklist,and Cochrane bias of risk assessment tool.A third investigator resolved any disagreement.RESULTS:A total of 62 articles were included.Based on the CONSORT statement,59.46%(22/37)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50%,mainly including“Identification as a randomized trial in the title(1/62,1.61%),”“How sample size was determined(7/62,11.29%),”“Implementation(1/62,1.61%),”“Blinding(1/62,1.61%),”and“Reports of Funding(4/62,6.45%).”According to the STRICTA checklist,29.41%(5/17)of all entries had a reporting rate of less than 50%,mainly including“Details of other interventions(7/58,12.07%),”“Setting and context of treatment(0/58,0%),”and“Description of participating acupuncturists(0/58,0%).”CONCLUSION:The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture and manipulation therapy for greater occipital neuralgia remains low.Future researchers need to make greater efforts to strictly adhere to the CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist during trial design,implementation,and reporting.This will facilitate the standardization of research in this field and enhance the reliability and reproducibility of the research近年来,针灸推拿疗法治疗枕大神经痛的临床研究报告逐渐增多,但质量参差不齐。目前尚未有文献对已发表报告进行质量评价,这不利于这些疗法的临床使用推广。为此,文章评价了针灸和推拿疗法治疗枕大神经痛随机对照试验的报告质量。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、维普、万方和中国生物医学文献数据库,检索时间从各数据库建库至2024-05-20,由2名研究者使用CONSORT声明、STRICTA清单和Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具独立评估纳入随机对照试验的报告质量,由第三位研究者负责解决过程中产生的分歧。结果:共纳入62篇文献。在CONSORT声明的评估中,报告率<50%的条目占全部条目的59.46%(22/37),主要包括“文题能识别是随机临床试验(1/62,1.61%)”“如何确定样本量(7/62,11.29%)”“随机的实施(1/62,1.61%)”“盲法(1/62,1.61%)”和“资金来源(4/62,6.45%)”等项目。在STRICTA清单的评估中,报告率<50%的条目占全部条目的29.41%(5/17),主要包括“针刺细节(7/58,12.07%)”“治疗的环境和背景(0/58,0%)”和“针灸师的相关描述(0/58,0%)”等项目。结论:针灸和手法治疗枕大神经痛的随机对照试验报告质量偏低,提示未来的研究人员需要在试验设计、实施和报告过程中严格遵守CONSORT声明及STRICTA清单的要求,这将促进该领域研究的规范化和标准化,增强研究结果的可靠性和可重复性。

关 键 词：reporting quality ACUPUNCTURE MANIPULATION CONSORT statement STRICTA checklist ROB clinical randomized controlled trials greater occipital neuralgia 

分 类 号：R459.9[医药卫生—治疗学] R318[医药卫生—临床医学] R246.6