从塔拉诺阿对话面临的挑战看全球气候治理的困境  

The Dilemma of Global Climate Governance:Insights on the Challenges from Talanoa Dialogue

作　　者：刘元玲[1] Liu Yuaning(Institute of American Studies,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100007,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院美国研究所,北京100007

出　　处：《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期105-112,共8页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science

基　　金：中国社会科学院智库基础研究项目(ZKJC242405)。

摘　　要：塔拉诺阿对话作为斐济的古老沟通传统,曾被引入全球气候治理进程,目的是提高各国的自主贡献力度,敦促相关各方提出更具雄心的目标,推动各国切实开展应对气候变化的行动。但当下全球气候治理的困境表明,塔拉诺阿对话在应对气候变化方面并未带来积极效果,主要原因在于该对话背后的思维范式与当前全球气候谈判主导的思维范式不同,前者主张超越二元对立,注重对话过程而非结果;后者主张互相对立,带有明确的立场预设,重目标而非过程。后者的思维范式能否以及能够在多大程度上得以转化,将对全球气候治理产生直接且深远的影响。从这个视角来看,塔拉诺阿对话并未失败,只是它超越性的思想内涵与当下的国际政治格格不入。As an ancient Fiji's communication tradition,the Talanoa Dialogue was introduced into the global climate governance process with the aim of enhancing countries'nationally determined contributions,urging relevant parties to propose more ambitious goals,and promoting concrete actions to address climate change.However,the current dilemma of global climate governance indicates that the dialogue has not yielded its intended positive outcomes,which is mainly due to the different thinking paradigms behind the Dialogue and the dominant mindset in current global climate negotiations.The former advocates transcendent binary oppositions and emphasizes the process of dialogue rather than the outcome,while the latter advocates mutual oppositions with a clear positional presupposition,and focuses on the goal rather than the process.Whether and to what extent the latter paradigm can be transformed will have a direct and profound impact on global climate governance.From this perspective,the Dialogue has not failed,but its transcendent ideological connotations are at odds with contemporary international politics.

关 键 词：塔拉诺阿对话 气候变化 气候治理 思维范式 时代精神 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系] P467[政治法律—政治学]