检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康旭东[1,2] 冯晓晨 林德明 郝涛[1,2] KANG Xu-dong;FENG Xiao-chen;LIN De-ming;HAO Tao(School of Public Administration and Policy,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116023,China;Liaoning Huanghai Laboratory,Dalian 116023,China)
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学公共管理学院,辽宁大连116023 [2]辽宁黄海实验室,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《科学学研究》2025年第3期617-629,共13页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(24BGL102)。
摘 要:自2015年《中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法》颁布以来,我国各个高校普遍提高了科技成果完成人的转化收益比例,目前已经成为收益分配比例最高的国家之一。为探究高比例的收益分配能否起到预期的激励作用,利用双重差分模型,选取中美两国重点高校科技成果转化的平衡面板数据进行政策效果的评估。结果表明,高比例的收益分配并未对高校科技成果转化呈现出正向、显著的直接促进作用,但是高比例的收益分配起到了信号传递的中介效应,其中介效应影响了资金投入等控制变量,同时此效应对转化水平不同的高校存在异质性的作用。Since the promulgation of the Law on Promoting the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements in 2015,Chinese universities generally increase the proportion of income to those who complete the achievements.China has become one of the highest proportion of income distribution countries.In order to explore whether the high proportion of income distribution can play the expected incentive role,the balanced panel data of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in key universities in China and the United States are selected to evaluate the policy effect by using the Differences-in-Differences model.The results show that the high proportion of income distribution does not have a positive and significant direct promoting effect on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities,but the high proportion of income distribution plays a mediating effect on signal transmission,which affects the control variables such as Government funds,and the effect has a heterogeneous effect on universities with different transformation levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.70.193