教材类图书出版中实质性相似侵权认定及应对研究  

Research on the Determination and Response of Substantive Similarity Infringement in Textbook Publishing

作　　者：宋歌 SONG Ge(Law school,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,210023,Nanjing,China)

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学法学院,南京210023

出　　处：《科技与出版》2025年第1期131-139,共9页Science-Technology & Publication

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“数据可携带权的理论构造与实现路径研究”(24CFX067)的研究成果。

摘　　要：教育出版的快速发展为教材类图书出版者提供了新的契机,但图书市场也面临着同质化现象明显、实质性相似侵权频发的问题。教材类图书较之于一般图书具有特殊性,这使得其实质性相似侵权认定存在专业性高、边界不清、标准复杂等困境。通过梳理司法裁判规则可知,法院通常从整体结构和内容编排双重维度进行考量,这为出版者内容审查的基本方式与侧重提供了参照。为了有效降低出版者在教材类图书出版中的实质性相似侵权风险,出版者应当从精准选择比照对象、合理确立对比方式等方面进行完善,并在实际面临侵权纠纷时有效提出抗辩事由,从而提高风险应对能力以保障自身权益。Textbooks play an important role in the development of China's publishing industry,with broad prospect and vast market.However,challenges persist,such as serious homogenization of bibliographies and frequent infringement of substantive similarity.These issues highlight the lack of systematic planning in the textbook publishing sector,resulting in the dilemma of limited quantity of high-quality textbook and intense market,and placing textbook publishers in a huge risk of infringement.Compared with general books,textbooks have special characteristics,which makes the identification of substantive similar infringement difficult,such as high professionalism,unclear boundary and complicated standard.It is necessary to sort out and summarize the adjudication rules formed in judicial practice in order to clarify the criteria for determining material similar infringement in the publication of textbook.Analyses of relevant judicial cases reveals that courts mainly review the material similar infringement of textbook from two aspects:overall structure and content arrangement.In terms of the overall structure,the most intuitive way to judge whether the two books are substantively similar is to compare their catalogues.In the process of catalogue comparison,courts have roughly formed two judgment ideas.One is to judge only the textual expression of the catalog itself,and the other is to examine and judge the text after the catalog and subheadings.Considering the dependency and consistency of the compilation of textbook,courts are more cautious when determining the substantive similarity of the overall structure,mainly in the following two exceptions.First,when judging whether there are substantive similarities in the whole textbooks involved in the case,various normative outlines belonging to the public domain should be excluded.Second,considering whether there is an indispensable reference for the similarity of the overall structure,if the teaching auxiliary books only use the catalog style of the corresponding textbook,and

关 键 词：教材类图书 图书出版 实质性相似 侵权认定 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]