新文科语境下文科类本科专业评价方法:适用困局与破壁路径  

The Evaluation Methods of Liberal Arts Undergraduate Majors in the Context of New Liberal Arts:Dilemma of Applicableness and Path of a Breakthrough

作　　者：何静[1] 李天杰 He Jing;Li Tianjie(Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211816,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学,江苏南京211816

出　　处：《高等农业教育》2024年第5期38-45,共8页Higher Agricultural Education

基　　金：2023年度江苏省高等教育质量保障与评价研究课题:新文科专业建设背景下文科类本科专业评价体系研究(2023-Y09)。

摘　　要：新文科建设对文科类本科专业评价体系尤其是评价方法提出了新的要求,同时也为新技术与新方法的引入进而实现传统文科创造性转型提供了契机。由于学科之间评价异质性对学术交流的制约,使得各学科专业之间的评价相对独立,因此,对文科类专业应当配套个性化的评价方法。当前评价方法还存在制约学术交流开展、前瞻性不足及评价对象选择局限等问题,这些问题导致评价结果无法全面反映学科发展趋势。有必要优化评价方法,通过重塑评价逻辑,引导专业建设回归本质,科学配比量化指标与定性指标,基于大数据的动态主体追踪与评估完善评价体系,以破解当下文科类本科专业评价面临的困局。The construction of new liberal arts has put forward new requirements for the evaluation system of Liberal arts undergraduate majors,especially the evaluation methods.At the same time,it also provides an opportunity to introduce new technologies and methods to achieve the creative transformation of traditional liberal arts.Due to the heterogeneity of evaluations between disciplines,academic exchanges are constrained,resulting in relatively independent evaluations between disciplines and majors.Therefore,personalized evaluation methods should be provided for Liberal arts majors.The current evaluation methods still have problems,such as restricting academic exchanges,insufficient foresight,and limited selection of evaluation objects,which result in evaluation results that cannot fully reflect the development trend of the discipline.In order to solve the current dilemma,it is necessary to optimize the evaluation methods,reshape the evaluation logic,guide professional construction to return to its essence,scientifically match quantitative and qualitative indicators,and improve the evaluation system based on dynamic subject tracking and evaluation using big data.

关 键 词：新文科 文科专业评价 适用方法 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]