检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈雪萍[1] 钟翊鸣 Chen Xueping;Zhong Yiming(Law School,South-central Minzu University,Wuhan,Hubei Province,430074)
出 处:《天津法学》2024年第4期94-104,共11页Tianjin Legal Science
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“数字资产信托法律问题研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:21BFX190;中央高校基金项目“‘双碳’目标下碳排放权交易的法律问题及信托法对策研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:CSZ22002。
摘 要:信托专业化的财产管理功能有助于权利人持有NFT,以信托方式持有NFT的前提条件是承认其具有信托财产的资格。当下,学界对NFT的理解存在局限性:将NFT底层财产限于作品,其代表的法律权利不清楚,且交付与公示方式不明确,合法性存疑。这些问题阻碍了NFT财产属性的认定,阻碍了NFT符合信托财产的要件。为此,有必要建立NFT与底层财产间的逻辑联系,明确界定NFT所代表的权利包括NFT本身及其底层财产的权利。明确所有财产均可成为NFT的底层财产,通过分类的方式明确不同底层财产NFT的交付与公示方式。在肯定NFT财产属性的基础上承认其具有可信托性。The specialized property management function of trusts helps rights holders to hold Non-Fungible Tokens(NFT),and the prerequisite for holding NFT in a trust manner is to recognize their eligibility for trust property.At present,there are limitations in the academic understanding of NFT:limiting the underlying assets of NFT to works,unclear legal rights represented by them,and unclear delivery and disclosure methods,raising doubts about their legality.These limitations hinder the identification of NFT property attributes and prevent NFT from meeting the requirements of trust property.Therefore,it is necessary to establish the logical connection between NFT and the underlying property,and clearly define the rights represented by NFT including the rights of NFT itself and the underlying property.It is clear that all property can become the underlying property of NFT,and the delivery and publicity methods of different underlying property NFT are clarified by means of classification.It is also clear to affrm the property attributes of NFT,recognize them as trust property,and confirm their trustworthiness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15