任务构思对二语写作CALF指标影响的元分析  

The Impact of Planning on CALF Measures in L2 Writing:A Meta-Analysis

作　　者：刘额尔德木吐 王俊菊[2] LIU Eerdemutu;WANG Junju(Inner Mongolia University;School of Foreign Languages and Literature,Shandong University,Licheng District,Jinan,Shandong,250100,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学 [2]山东大学外国语学院,济南市250100

出　　处：《现代外语》2025年第1期116-128,共13页Modern Foreign Languages

摘　　要：任务构思对二语写作质量的影响日益受到关注。本研究运用元分析方法整合相关实证(k=53),综合分析任务构思对二语写作句法复杂度、准确度、词汇复杂度和流利度(CALF)的影响。结果表明,写前独立构思相较于无构思对句法复杂度、准确度和流利度指标均有积极影响,但对词汇复杂度无影响。在线独立构思和无构思在全部CALF指标均没有显著差异;在线独立构思相较于写前独立构思仅在词汇复杂度上有所提升。写前合作构思相较于写前独立构思在准确度上提升。上述发现证实了写前独立构思、在线独立构思和写前合作构思对写作质量不同方面的有效性,有助于教师了解并利用不同的构思方式提高学生的二语写作水平。The impact of task planning on L2 writing quality has garnered attention. This metaanalysis(k = 53) examines how different types of planning affect the syntactic complexity, accuracy,lexical complexity, and fluency(CALF) of L2 writing. Results show that pre-writing individual planning, compared to no planning, positively influences syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency but not lexical complexity. No significant differences are found between online individual planning and no planning in any CALF measures. However, online individual planning, compared to pre-writing individual planning, improves lexical complexity. Furthermore, pre-writing collaborative planning, compared to pre-writing individual planning, enhances accuracy. These findings highlight the effectiveness of various planning methods in different aspects of L2 writing,offering insights for teachers to improve students' L2 writing performance.

关 键 词：写前独立构思 在线独立构思 写前合作构思 二语写作语言表现 元分析 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]