智慧城市建设的影响因素与生成机理研究——基于24个案例的模糊集定性比较分析  

Research on Influencing Factors and Formation Mechanisms of Smart City Construction:A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 24 Cases

作　　者：杨秀勇 滕云飞 Yang Xiuyong;Teng Yunfei(School of Political Science and Public Administration,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266061,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛大学政治与公共管理学院,山东青岛266061

出　　处：《东方论坛—青岛大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期145-156,共12页Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字技术驱动社区治理共同体的机理与路径研究”(23CZZ026);青岛市社会科学规划项目“青岛市数字技术赋能社区治理共同体建设路径研究”(QDSKL2301075)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：智慧城市建设既是实现国家治理体系与治理能力现代化的重要组成部分,也是提升城市治理水平的内在驱动力。基于TOE分析框架,利用模糊集定性比较分析方法对我国24个智慧城市建设的典型案例进行分析,以探究智慧城市建设的影响因素和生成机理。研究发现:智慧城市建设受到数字基础设施、数字服务平台、组织整合、政策支撑、数字公共服务需求、经济发展水平等要素的共同影响,单一要素无法单独构成智慧城市建设的必要条件。智慧城市建设的生成机理具有“殊途同归”的特征,可以归结为技术驱动型、权威主导型和需求驱动型。其中,技术驱动型智慧城市主要以数字基础设施和数字服务平台建设为核心,并辅之以有效的组织整合和良好经济发展水平;权威主导型智慧城市则以组织整合、政策支撑和良好的财政资源禀赋为核心条件;需求驱动的智慧城市主要以数字公共服务需求和政策支撑为核心条件。基于此,为了更好地推进智慧城市建设,可以从采取“因地制宜”的差异化建设路径、构建要素协同机制、加强高素质数字人才培育三个方面进行重点推进。Smart city construction is not only a vital component of modernizing national governance systems and capabilities but also an intrinsic driver for enhancing urban governance.Based on the TOE framework,this study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to examine 24 typical cases of smart city construction in China,aiming to explore the influencing factors and formation mechanisms of smart city development.The findings reveal that smart city construction is jointly shaped by factors including digital infrastructure,digital service platforms,organizational integration,policy support,demand for digital public services,and economic development levels.No single factor alone constitutes a necessary condition for smart city construction.The formation mechanisms,which are characterized by "different paths,same destination",can be categorized into three types:technology-driven,authority-led,and demand-driven.Specifically,technology-driven smart cities prioritize digital infrastructure and service platforms,supplemented by effective organizational integration and robust economic development;authority-led smart cities rely on organizational integration,policy support,and strong fiscal resources;demand-driven smart cities focus on the demand for digital public services and policy support.To advance smart city construction,tailored strategies should be adopted based on local conditions,synergistic mechanisms among key elements should be established,and the cultivation of high-quality digital talents should be prioritized.

关 键 词：智慧城市 TOE框架 模糊集定性比较分析 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]