检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏厚福 余自力 XIA Houfu;YU Zili(State Key Laboratory of Oral&Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration,Key Labora-tory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education,Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology,School&Hospital of Stomatology,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079,China)
机构地区:[1]口颌系统重建与再生全国重点实验室,口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室,口腔医学湖北省重点实验室,武汉大学口腔医(学)院,武汉大学口腔医院口腔颌面头颈肿瘤外科,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《全科医学临床与教育》2025年第3期241-244,共4页Clinical Education of General Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(82101036)。
摘 要:针对口腔医学专业型研究生的培养,当前“双轨合一”的模式充分贯彻了提升临床技能的要求,但仍存在忽视“科研能力”的局限性。缺乏创新性科研能力的专业型研究生在成长为未来的医师主力军之后,必然是难以适应医疗服务升级的发展潮流,也无法肩负引领医学科技创新的时代使命。本次研究从培养方案、学生定位、考核体系等方面分析了当前培养模式对提升口腔颌面外科专业型研究生科研能力的局限,并分享了我院基于理论与实践并重、导师加团队指引、交流及考核创新等举措所做出的一些探索性培养策略,以及这些策略的具体实践效果和面临的挑战。The current "dual-track integration" model for training stomatology graduate students effectively addresses the enhancement of clinical skills,but it still has limitations in fostering "scientific research ability." Graduate students lacking innovative research skills may struggle to adapt to the evolving demands of medical service advancements and will be unable to lead in medical science and technology innovation as future healthcare professionals.This paper examines the shortcomings of the existing training approach in developing scientific research skills for oral and maxillofacial surgery graduate students,focusing on the training program,student orientation,and assessment system.It also shares exploratory strategies implemented by our hospital,combining theory with practice,mentor and team guidance,as well as communication and assessment innovations,alongside the practical effects and challenges of these strategies.
分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7