检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王乾宇 Wang Qianyu
机构地区:[1]北京大学艺术学院
出 处:《电影艺术》2025年第2期136-143,共8页Film Art
摘 要:印度电影在中国的早期传播状况是被忽视的问题域。民国报刊中关于“印度电影”的资讯、报道和讨论大致将这一传播状况勾勒为两个阶段和四个子时期。1916年至1935年为概念形成阶段。印度电影首先通过资讯、进而通过放映形成民族电影概念。1935年至1951年为对比批评阶段。中国电影界认为印度电影的核心特征是“国民性”,并先后对其展现出求索与自省的态度。印度电影的“国民性”特征使之成为中国电影“国民性”表达的对照及范例。The early spread of Indian films in China is a neglected issue. The information, reports and discussions on “Indian films” in the Republicanera Chinese Press outline this dissemination into two phases and four sub-periods. 1916 to 1935 is the conceptualization phase. From 1916 to 1935 is the conceptualization phase, in which the concept of Indian cinema was formed first through information and then through screening. 1935 to 1951 is the comparative criticism phase. The Chinese film industry believed that the core characteristic of Indian cinema was “ethnicity character” and successively showed a searching and self-reflective attitude towards it. The “ethnicity character” of Indian cinema made itself a comparison and example for the expression of ethnicity in Chinese cinema.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.173.228