检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李锦华 LI Jin-hua
出 处:《北方论丛》2025年第2期79-92,共14页The Northern Forum
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“当代中国数字法学基本范畴体系研究”(23&ZD154)。
摘 要:从删除权的法律和实践角度来看,二者之间存在差距。导致这一差距的主要原因是权利实施中的操作性障碍。这些障碍源自信息处理需求与删除需求的冲突、除外条款和利益平衡的不确定性,以及技术上的限制。通过差距成因分析,可以进一步审视数字时代个人信息删除权的个体需求,探讨其在维护个人尊严与身份构建方面的价值功能。在此基础上,结合删除权的工具性、沟通性和程序性特征,适度扩大信息删除的适用范围。并根据不同的应用场景和手段,通过技术手段提升删除权的实际效果,从语境和技术两个层面对个人信息删除的实践进行优化。From the perspective of the law and practice of the right of deletion,there is a gap between the two.The main reason for this gap is the operational obstacles in the implementation of the right.These obstacles stem from the conflict between information processing needs and deletion needs,the uncertainty of exclusion clauses and the balance of interests,as well as technical limitations.Through the analysis of the causes of the gap,the individual needs of the right to delete personal information in the digital age can be further examined,and its value and function in maintaining personal dignity and identity construction can be explored.On this basis,by combining the instrumental,communicative and procedural characteristics of the right of deletion,the scope of application of information deletion can be moderately expanded.And according to different application scenarios and means,the actual effect of the right of deletion can be enhanced through technical means,and the practice of personal information deletion can be optimized from both the context and technical levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.192.254