再论隐私权与个人信息权益界分  

Further Discussion on the Distinction Between Privacy Rights and Personal Information Rights

作　　者：杨超 Yang Chao(Law School of Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,沈阳110036

出　　处：《湖北工程学院学报》2025年第2期90-96,共7页Journal of Hubei Engineering University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“个人信息检察行政公益诉讼研究”(24YJA820026)。

摘　　要：隐私权与个人信息权益的界分问题一直未能得到妥善解决。界分包括两种类型:一是各自独立成权下的界分,二是两者交叉重叠下的界分。前者的问题在于预设两者之相互对立状态,忽略了隐私权的积极面向;后者的问题在于误将隐私与个人信息定位为描述性概念,致使界分停留在语义反复层面。两者背后的价值理念和利益指向是更为根本的界分指引,即隐私利益优位于其他利益,人格尊严区分于私法自治。隐私利益包括隐私内涵的重新厘定和场景理论的应用两个方面;两者在“处理”条件下的不同适用状态也是最鲜明的差异。The boundaries of the rights and personal information rights and personal information have not been properly resolved.At present,there are two types of boundaries:one is the boundary of each independent power,and the other is the division of the cross overlap over overlap between the two.The problem of the former is the opposition between the two,ignoring the positive aspect of privacy,causing the boundary to not meet the actual status quo;At the level of semantics.The internal logic of the boundary score is that the value concept and interest behind the two point the more fundamental boundary guidelines:interest points to obvious level requirements,that is,privacy benefits are located in other types of interests;personality dignity is distinguished from the autonomy of private law.The interests behind determine the direction of the value concept.Therefore,the interpretation of privacy interests is the prerequisite problem that must be solved first,and it is also the most direct way to the two.In terms of,this is also the essential element of the boundary score.Secondly,in terms of form,the different applications of the two in the"processing"conditions are also the most distinctive difference.

关 键 词：隐私权 个人信息权益 人格尊严 隐私利益 个人信息处理 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]