《仲裁法》修改的理想与现实——以总则为视角  

Ideals and Realities of the Amendment to the Arbitration Act 1994

作　　者：宋连斌[1] Song Lianbin

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学

出　　处：《南大法学》2025年第2期1-15,共15页NanJing University Law Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“法治现代化视角下我国国家法治形象构建问题研究”(批准号:20BFX001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1994年《仲裁法》修改之必要在仲裁界及相关的法律界已形成一定共识。我国立法机关在修改《仲裁法》时,应注意继承与扬弃相结合、理念与规则相结合、国际化与本土化及民间化相结合、现实性与前瞻性相结合,基于实证,总结过往,从更好地利用仲裁方式化解商事纠纷、疏减讼源,营造更佳营商环境出发,使《仲裁法》的修改更科学、更专业,更能高效回应仲裁实务需求。就《仲裁法》第一章“总则”而言,应保留原有的协议仲裁原则、一裁终局原则,并可考虑增加关于放弃异议权、司法有限干预及支持仲裁的规定。There is a consensus in the arbitration and legal communities on the necessity of amending the Arbitration Act 1994.When revising the Arbitration Act 1994,the legislative body should focus on a balanced approach that integrates inheritance with innovation,principles with rules,internationalization with localization and public engagement,and practicality with foresight.Drawing on empirical evidence,the revision should summarize past experience to optimize the use of arbitration in resolving commercial disputes,reducing litigation,and fostering a better business environment.This approach will make the revised Arbitration Act 1994 more scientific,professional,and responsive to practical arbitration needs.Regarding Chapter 1,“General Provisions”,it is recommended to retain the principles of consensual arbitration and finality of arbitration award,while also considering to add provisions on waiver of objections,limited judicial intervention,and judicial support for arbitration.

关 键 词：1994年《仲裁法》 商事仲裁 仲裁法修改 立法科学性 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]