检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖雪 胡冰川[1,2] XIAO Xue;HU Bingchuan(School of Applied Economics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China;Rural Development Institute,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院,北京102488 [2]中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,北京100732
出 处:《人口与发展》2025年第2期51-62,共12页Population and Development
基 金:中国社会科学院重大经济社会调查项目“乡村振兴综合调查及中国农村调查数据库项目”(GQDC2020017);2023年中国国家留学基金委建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(202304920035)。
摘 要:研究基于2020年全国十省农户数据,采用处理效应模型探究亲子同住对农村老年人幸福感的影响。研究发现,当前亲子同住总体上降低了农村老年人的幸福感,在一系列检验后结果稳健。与客观上需要亲子同住的农村老年群体不同,亲子同住会对低龄、健康状况较好、有配偶及无家庭成员外出务工的农村老年人幸福感产生负面影响。机制分析表明,隔代照料是造成亲子同住降低农村老年人幸福感的重要中介变量。研究有利于理解居住模式差异对农村老年人福祉的影响,并为保障和提升亲子同住农村老年人的幸福感提供了一定启示。Based on data of 10 provinces in China in 2020,this paper used treatment effect model to investigate the impact of living arrangements on the well-being of the rural older adults.It is found that living with sons or daughters reduce the well-being of the rural older adults overall.The results are robust after a series of tests.Unlike the rural older adults group who need to live with children,living with sons or daughters has negative impact on the rural older adults who are younger,healthier,married,and have no family members working outside.Mechanism analysis shows that intergeneration care is an important mediating variable among the negative influence.This study is helpful for understanding the impact of different living arrangements on the welfare of the rural older adults.It also provides insights for improving the well-being of the rural older people who live with children.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49