检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雯婧[1] Wang Wenjing
出 处:《音乐艺术(上海音乐学院学报)》2024年第6期42-51,共10页Art of Music(Journal of the Shanghai Conservatory of Music)
摘 要:隋唐五代声乐批评文献具有混生性特征,其批评属性不够清晰,艺术成分不够足量。由于广泛运用诗赋化的夸张修辞手法,故“作品本事”难以把握。声乐技术批评的文学化特征,使得这类历史文献长期被文学界先辈、同仁作文学角度解读。这些解读形成了高强度心理定势,使得后人们下意识地以为这些文献“就是”或“仅是”文学作品,这种心理定势对于声乐批评的发展非常不利。关于歌者的批评具有故事化特征,批评文本充斥着渲染性、夸张化的文学修辞,这给声乐批评研究带来困扰。The vocal music criticism literature in the Sui Dynasty,the Tang Dynasty,and the Five Dynasties has a characteristic of hybridity,with less critical quality and artistic significance.Due to the extensive use of exaggerated rhetorical devices,it is difficult to grasp the essence of these works.The literary characteristic of vocal music criticism has long caused these historical documents to be interpreted from a literary perspective by literary scholars.Such a stereotyped image,which made people consider these reviews as literary works,has had a negative impact on the development of vocal music criticism.The storytelling characteristics of the reviews of singers and the exaggerated rhetoric applied have also caused problems for the research of vocal musiccriticism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222