文化交流的双向性——关于“丝路”视域下的艾捷克起源研究  

The Two-Way Exchanges between Cultures--On the Origin of Ghijak from the Perspective of the Silk Road

作　　者：祖木来提·吐尔共 Zumulaiti Tuergong

机构地区：[1]中国音乐学院,北京830002

出　　处：《音乐艺术(上海音乐学院学报)》2024年第6期52-63,共12页Art of Music(Journal of the Shanghai Conservatory of Music)

基　　金：中国音乐学院研究生培养科研资助项目“陆上丝绸之路弓弦类乐器研究”阶段性成果,项目批准号:20222001/027。

摘　　要：艾捷克是中国众多弓弦乐器中的一种。学界对艾捷克的起源问题,尚未形成依据完整的共识。但研究现状中众云亦云、只引一种观点“陈述”艾捷克起源的文献占多数。再者,因中国新疆受丝路音乐文化影响的“刻板印象”,使文化交融的“双向性”容易被忽略,从而造成部分早期推测被普遍转述为“定论”现象。艾捷克作为中国在丝路文化交流中枢纽地段的乐器,在中国胡琴源流研究中应被重视。厘清艾捷克起源研究,可分为三大视角,分别是历史发展脉络的视角、乐器名称词意的视角,以及乐器形制的视角。分析和反思其中存在的问题,能够产生新的认识,如艾捷克名称释译可能是“摩擦演奏的东西”,而非源自“艾介姆”一词等。Ghijak is one of the many bowed string instruments in China.However,the academia has not yet reached a well-founded consensus on the origin of Ghijak.The majority of these studies usually generalized or cited a single viewpoint to"describe"rather than to"discuss"the instrument's origin.As the influence of the Silk Road music culture in Xinjiang has become a"stereotype,"the"two-way exchanges"of cultures have been overlooked,resulting in some of the early speculations being commonly considered as"conclusions."As a musical instrument in the pivotal area where Chinese culture exchanges with Silk Road cultures,the Ghijak should be valued in the research of the origin of the Chinese huqin.To clarify the origin of Ghijak,three perspectives can be adopted:the historical context,the meaning of its name,and its shape and structure.Analyzing and reflecting on related issues can lead to new insights.For example,the name"Ghijak"may refer to"something played by friction,"rather than deriving from the word"ajem."

关 键 词：艾捷克 弓弦乐器 起源 丝路 名称 

分 类 号：J607[艺术—音乐]