检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏达 高利红[2] Su Da;Gao Lihong
机构地区:[1]厦门大学法学院博士后流动站,厦门361005 [2]中南财经政法大学法学院,武汉430073
出 处:《新文科教育研究》2025年第1期48-70,142,共24页NEW LIBERAL ARTS EDUCATION RESEARCH
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“金钱类环境责任的序位与衔接研究”(编号:21BFX132)阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:唐代道德秩序与法律秩序混同,动物作为道德关怀对象亦被纳入法律规则体系内,动物禁屠制度是道德制度化的表现形式。除诏令之外,动物禁屠法律形式还表现为《唐律疏议》中严格禁屠的刑责规定。禁屠内容可以分为畜牧动物禁屠与野生动物禁屠法律制度。除工具效用、功利主义的考量外,唐代动物禁屠法律制度还包含对动物的生命关怀与感恩主义的法律价值,承认动物的情感感知能力,建立对动物的直接道德义务。此则回应了破解今日中国动物相关保护立法“人类中心主义”法治意识形态的需求,能够重焕中华法系追求人与动物和谐相处的法律内蕴。In the Tang Dynasty,the moral order was intertwined with the legal order,and animals,as part of the moral universe,were also included in the system of rules of Tang law.In addition to the imperial decree,the legal form of animal slaughter ban was also manifested in the strict penal provisions in the Tang Code.The bans on slaughter can be divided into a ban on slaughtering livestock animals and a ban on hunting wild wildlife,collectively forming the legal framework for the ban.In addition to economic and utilitarian considerations,the legal system also contains legal values of care and gratitude for the lives of animals,and recognizes the ability of animals to perceive their emotions,establishing a direct moral obligation to animals.Such legal philosophy transcends the“anthropocentrism”of China’s animal-related protection legislation,and can revive the legal connotation of the Chinese legal system’s pursuit of harmonious coexistence between humans and animals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222