检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔一帆 KONG Yi-fan(Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,Anhui)
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学,安徽合肥230009
出 处:《江苏商论》2025年第4期123-126,共4页Jiangsu Commercial Forum
摘 要:作为知识产权民事责任中最强力的手段,惩罚性赔偿在民法典和知识产权相关立法中均有明确规定。但实际上知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿在实施中不断“遇冷”,制度本身面临着适用条件模糊、赔偿计算标准缺乏合理性以及赔偿适用主体过少等多重困境。通过梳理中国知识产权惩罚性赔偿立法和司法现状,借鉴域外成功经验,建议在立法上对惩罚性赔偿的主观适用条件进行统一界定,厘清惩罚性赔偿的计算标准。在司法实践中进一步扩大赔偿的适用主体范围,确保惩罚性赔偿制度在实践中发挥功能。As the most powerful means of civil liability for intellectual property,punitive damages are clearly stipulated in both the Civil Code and relevant legislation on intellectual property.However,in reality,punitive damages for intellectual property infringement are constantly being“neglected”in implementation,and the system itself faces multiple challenges such as vague application conditions,lack of rationality in compensation calculation standards,and insufficient number of compensation applicable subjects.By reviewing the current legislative and judicial status of punitive damages for intellectual property in China and drawing on successful experiences from outside the country,it is suggested to unify the subjective application conditions of punitive damages in legislation and clarify the calculation standards of punitive damages.Further expand the scope of the applicable subjects of compensation in judicial practice,ensuring that the punitive damages system functions effectively in practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70