检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙文波 SUN Wenbo(School of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102400,China)
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2025年第2期70-79,共10页Journal of Tangshan University
摘 要:生成式人工智能的多场景适用正呈现出不可阻挡的嬗变趋势,而在其实现规模化应用的同时却伴生着多维风险,风险“进化”的损害则又会引致归责问题。以往归责路径中,人工智能的侵权责任由提供者、管理者或使用者承担。如今,生成式人工智能存在成为法律拟制主体的可能,因此其责任认定应有别于传统认知论。建议以赋予生成式人工智能有限法律人格为逻辑起点、以围绕“生命周期”分阶段认定责任为逻辑顺延、以处财产责任抑或增添责任类型为逻辑闭环,来促进人工智能从“可控制”发展至“可规制”。The multi-scenario application of generative artificial intelligence(AI)is showing an unstoppable trend of transformation.However,while achieving large-scale application,it is accompanied by multi-dimensional risks,and the“evolution”of these risks leads to issues of responsibility attribution.In previous attribution paths,the tort liability of AI was borne by providers,administrator or users.Now,generative AI has the potential to become a legal person,so its responsibility attribution should differ from traditional cognitive theories.It is suggested to start with the logic of granting generative AI limited legal personality,extend the logic of phased responsibility attribution around the“life cycle”,and close the logic loop with property liability or the addition of liability types,thereby promoting the development of AI from“controllable”to“regulatable”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15