风俗文化视域下马瑞辰与胡承珙《诗经》研究的差异  

Differences in the Study of The Book of Songs Between Ma Ruichen andHu Chenggong from the Perspective of Customs and Culture

作　　者：于春莉 彭蕾 刘佳悦 YU Chunli;PENG Lei;LIU Jiayue(School of Marxism,Anhui university of Technology,Ma anshan,Anhui 243000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽工业大学马克思主义学院,安徽马鞍山24300

出　　处：《南昌师范学院学报》2025年第1期39-42,共4页Journal of Nanchang Normal University

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“皖籍经学家马瑞辰与胡承珙《诗经》学比较研究”(AHSKY2019D120)。

摘　　要：马瑞辰和胡承珙均是清代《诗经》学研究的代表人物,他们都曾通过风俗文化的阐释视角研究《诗经》文本含义,但存在差异。胡氏更多的是从诗文可能牵涉的政治现实、历史人物等入手,更加热衷于探讨《诗经》的政治教化意蕴,反映了他治经坚守《诗序》、毛《传》的特点,但解读易僵化。马氏往往更能从整首诗的大义、上下文语言环境去考虑诗篇的风俗意蕴,研究带有强烈的“文学还原”意味,展现出不拘泥于旧说的独立研究态度和开阔、宏通的学术视野。Ma Ruichen and Hu Chenggong were both representative scholars in the study of The Book of Songs during the Qing Dynasty.Although both explored the textual meanings of The Book of Songs through the lens of customs and culture,their approaches differed.Hu tended to focus on the political realities and historical figures referenced in the poems,emphasizing the political and didactic implications of The Book of Songs.His interpretation reflected his adherence to The Preface to The Book of Songs and Mao s Commentary,yet it often appeared rigid.In contrast,Ma was more inclined to interpret the customs and cultural connotations of the poems based on their overall meaning and linguistic context.His research carried a strong sense of“literary restoration”,demonstrating an independent scholarly approach that was not confined to traditional interpretations and exhibiting a broad and insightful academic vision.

关 键 词：风俗文化 马瑞辰 胡承珙 《诗经》 差异 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]