反垄断法视野下药品专利反向支付协议违法性认定原则研究——由我国首例反向支付协议案件引发的思考  

Research on the Principle of Determining Illegality of Reverse Payment Agreement for Drug Patent from the Perspective of Anti-monopoly Law——Reflections on the first case of reverse payment agreement in China

作　　者：欧阳素珍 OUYANG Suzhen

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院

出　　处：《价格理论与实践》2024年第12期74-80,177,共8页Price:Theory & Practice

摘　　要：随着各国反垄断执法的深入,反向支付协议与专利丛林、产品跳转的叠加,以及NO-AG条款的泛化等无疑是促使反向支付协议违法性认定原则分歧愈演愈烈的根源所在。对于反向支付协议应适用何种反垄断审查原则争议不断,一定程度上影响了法律适用的准确性和可预测性,从而影响反垄断法公平正义的价值追求。因此,需要厘清反向支付协议的违法性认定原则,而诉诸“禁止+豁免”违法性认定原则不仅符合我国现阶段的药品市场发展需求,同时可以提高法律实施结果的可预见性。With the deepening of anti-monopoly law enforcement in various countries,the superposition of reverse payment agreements and patent jungle,product jump,and the generalization of NO-AG clause is undoubtedly the root cause of the growing disagreement on the principle of determining illegality of reverse payment agreement.Towards the controversy over which anti-monopoly review principle should be applied to reverse payment agreement has affected the accuracy and feasibility of law application to some extent predictability,thus affecting the value pursuit of fairness and justice in anti-monopoly law.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the illegality of the reverse payment agreement,while resorting to the illegality determination principle of“prohibition+exemption”not only meets the development needs of China’s drug market at the present stage,but also can Improve the predictability of the results of law enforcement.

关 键 词：反向支付协议 垄断协议 违法性认定原则 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学] D923.42[政治法律—法学]