检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐申 Xu Shen
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《厦门大学法律评论》2024年第2期111-123,共13页Xiamen University Law Review
基 金:司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目一般课题“信息网络犯罪司法治理的中国实践研究”(项目编号:24SFB2011)的阶段性成果
摘 要:作为社会治理工具的酒驾法律,有效地规制了酒后驾驶的行为。但是,酒驾治理在实践中也引发了诸多社会问题,主要表现为三点:一是醉驾案件数量持续保持高位,犯罪人数急剧攀升,加剧社会治理风险;二是酒驾治理更可能“锚定穷人”,相较于富人阶层,社会底层群体更容易落入醉驾的法网中;三是酒驾犯罪的标签效应给当事人及其家属带来严重的负面影响。要深刻理解这些问题产生的原因,不仅要从法律工具主义的视域,观察酒驾治理在实践中的具体形态,分析行政部门的执法策略和动力,探索犯罪记录封存制度设计;也要看到作为社会镜像的酒驾法律,在农村社会与风俗习惯的紧张关系,并采用“定制法”的方式弥合社会关系的空间差异。Since drunk driving was criminalized by legislation,it has played an important role in regulating the behavior of drunk driving.However,drunk driving governance has result in many social problems in practice,which are mainly manifested in three aspects:first,the number of drunk driving cases continues to remain high,and the number of criminals rises sharply,aggravating the risk of social governance;second,drunk driving governance is more likely to“anchor the poor”,compared with the rich class,the bottom of society is more likely to fall into the legal net;third,the record of drunk driving crime brings serious negative effects to the parties and their families.In order to deeply understand the causes of these problems,we ought not only observe the specific form of drunk driving governance in practice from the perspective of legal instrumentalism,analyze the law enforcement strategy and motivation of administrative departments,and explore the design of criminal record sealing system.It is also necessary to see the drunk driving law as a social mirror,the tense relationship between rural society and customs,and the use of“personalized law”to bridge the spatial differences in social relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38