限缩的结果加重犯及其中国实践  

The Result of Limiting and Reducing Aggravated Crime and Its Practice in China

作　　者：张钟祺 ZHANG Zhong-qi(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100080,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100080

出　　处：《河北法学》2025年第4期183-200,共18页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2021年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“功能主义视域下行政犯归责原理的重构与适用研究”(21YJC820030)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：结果加重犯仅存在故意+过失的罪过构造,且加重结果只限于对生命法益的侵害。其处罚根据应采用结合说,即加重处罚的原因不仅是结果加重犯关联的类型性危险所导致的违法性增加,还在于违反一般预防。现有的归属理论因其局限性应当修正,直接性要件的本质就是因果关系理论,应采用客观归属理论进行构建。基本行为的危险制造不限于行为本身的具体危险,还包括行为实行过程中产生的抽象危险,二者实现其一就具备直接性。在功能主义解释和刑事政策的视阈下,对于生命法益的结果归属可以缓和地考虑。Results the aggravating crime only has the structure of intention+fault,and the aggravating result is limited to the infringement of life legal interest.The punishment basis should adopt the combination theory,that is,the reason for the aggravation of punishment is not only the increase of illegality caused by the type of risk associated with the aggravation of the result,but also the violation of general prevention.The existing attribution theory should be modified because of its limitations.The essence of directness is the causal theory,which should be constructed by objective attribution theory.The danger of the basic behavior is not limited to the specific danger of the behavior itself,but also includes the abstract danger produced in the process of the implementation of the behavior,and the realization of one of the two has the directness.Under the perspective of functionalist interpretation and criminal policy,the result of the legal interest of life can be considered gently.

关 键 词：结果加重犯 犯罪类型 侵害生命法益 归属理论 直接性要件 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]