我国裁判文书援引最高人民法院出版物的功能与反思  

Function and Reflection of Chinese Judgment Documents Invoking Publications of the Supreme People’s Court

作　　者：周晓帆 Zhou Xiaofan

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2025年第1期76-88,共13页Huxiang Law Revie

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:当代中国裁判文书说理中的“引经据典研究”(23YJC820060)。

摘　　要：最高人民法院出版物指最高人民法院主管或下设的出版物,还包括最高人民法院“冠名”的审判业务指导类作品。由于最高人民法院的权威以及最高人民法院出版物指导审判实践的实用性,我国裁判文书援引最高人民法院出版物的情况较常出现,法官对这类做法持不同的态度。基于依法裁判的要求,最高人民法院出版物只能作为裁判理由而不是裁判依据。个案裁判中,最高人民法院出版物具有填补法律漏洞、进行法律解释以及法律论证等现实功能。当前,裁判文书援引最高人民法院出版物存在取代法条、与司法解释混淆以及冗余论证等问题,存在消解司法解释权威、损害形式法治等风险,司法援引最高人民法院出版物需要遵循必要的限度。The publications of the Supreme People’s Court refer to the publications under the jurisdiction or subordinate of the Supreme People’s Court,as well as the judicial guidance works under the title of the Supreme People’s Court.Due to the authority of the Supreme People’s Court and the practicality of guiding judicial practice,it is common for Chinese judicial documents to cite publications of the Supreme People’s Court,and judges have different attitudes towards such practices.Based on the requirement of legal judgment,the publications of the Supreme People’s Court can only serve as reasons for judgment rather than as a basis for judgment.In case judgments,publications of the Supreme People’s Court have practical functions such as filling legal loopholes,providing legal interpretations,and conducting legal arguments.At present,there are issues with the use of publications of the Supreme People’s Court in judicial documents,such as replacing legal provisions,confusion with judicial interpretations,and redundant argumentation,which may undermine the authority of judicial interpretations and damage the formal rule of law.Judicial use of publications of the Supreme People’s Court needs to follow necessary limits.

关 键 词：最高人民法院出版物 审判指导 法治风险 运用限度 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]