论我国垄断协议安全港规则的适用  

On the Application of Safe Harbor Rules of Monopoly Agreement in Our Country

作　　者：丁亚琦 吴祎凝 Ding Yaqi;Wu Yining

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2025年第1期104-118,共15页Huxiang Law Revie

摘　　要：随着市场经济的迅速发展,经营者之间的合作日益频繁,由此导致的垄断协议的显著增加正损害着我国的经济运行效率、市场竞争秩序以及消费者权益。因此,垄断协议成为反垄断法规制的重中之重。为提升对垄断协议的审查效率与规制效果,我国2022年修订的《反垄断法》首次明确规定了安全港规则。然而该法实施至今,安全港规则的实际适用效果并未完全实现其“安全”初衷。目前我国涉及垄断协议安全港规则的法律规定在适用范围、适用标准以及适用程序上不清晰,给反垄断执法机关带来巨大挑战。通过深入剖析安全港规则的内涵与发展脉络,借鉴欧美国家在安全港规则实践方面的丰富经验可知,有必要界定安全港规则合理适用范围,设置科学适用标准以及构建程序机制,以此让安全港规则发挥其应有之效用。With the rapid development of market economy,the cooperation between business operators is becoming more and more frequent.The increasing monopoly agreements are damaging the efficiency of our economy,the order of market competition and consumer rights.Therefore,monopoly agreement has become the top priority of anti-monopoly law regulation.In order to improve the review efficiency and regulatory effect of monopoly agreements,China has defined the safe harbor rule for the first time in the Anti-Monopoly Law revised in 2022.However,so far,the actual application effect of the safe harbor rule has not fully realized its“safety”original intention.At present,the legal provisions concerning the safe harbor rule of monopoly agreement in our country are not clear in the applicable scope,applicable standards and applicable procedures,which brings great challenges to the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.Through in-depth analysis of the connotation and development of the safe harbor rule,we can learn from the rich experience of European and American countries in the practice of the safe harbor rule:it is necessary to define the reasonable scope of application of the safe harbor rule,set up scientific applicable standards and build procedural mechanisms,so as to make the safe harbor rule play its due effect.

关 键 词：安全港规则 垄断协议 反垄断规制 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]