检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈费伟 马瑗 SHEN Feiwei;MA Yuan
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期88-100,共13页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“数字乡村标准化建设的绩效评价与提升策略研究”(24BZZ069)。
摘 要:数字乡村治理在促进乡村振兴绩效的同时,也面临着同质化建设的现实问题。以适应性治理为理论基础,从多元主体合作、遵循地方知识、弹性制度设计、健全反馈机制四个维度,构建数字乡村高质量发展的优化路径。研究发现,数字乡村适应性治理遵循着项目统筹规划、企业规范运营、数据共享开放、安全能力提升、建设成果普惠的实践逻辑,这实则反映了乡村自协调、自组织、自发展、自适应的内在机理。尽管当前数字乡村治理取得了重要成效,但也出现了适应性不足的现实困境,具体表现为参与主体碎片化、数字思维简单化、政策执行模式化以及反馈体系机械化。基于此,未来需要在主体层面实现合作参与、多元协同,在思维层面实现内生发展、精准供给,在政策层面实现差异化执行、因地制宜,在反馈层面实现机制健全、保障村民合法权益,以更好地促进数字乡村治理绩效,真正实现乡村振兴目标。In recent years,as the performance of rural revitalization has been advanced,digital rural governance has encountered the practical challenge of uniform construction.Utilizing adaptive governance as an analytical framework,this paper endeavors to establish an optimization pathway for the high-quality development of digital rural areas across four dimensions:multi-stakeholder collaboration,leveraging local knowledge,flexible institutional design,and robust feedback mechanisms.The study reveals that the adaptive governance of digital villages adheres to a practical logic that encompasses project coordination and planning,standardized enterprise operations,data sharing and openness,enhanced security capabilities,and universally beneficial construction outcomes.These aspects,in essence,reflect the intrinsic mechanisms of self-coordination,self-organization,self-development,and self-adaptation within villages.Although current digital rural governance has yielded significant achievements,the reality of its limited adaptability presents a dilemma,particularly evident in the fragmentation of participating subjects,digital mindset limitations,simplistic policy implementation approaches,and a mechanized feedback system.In light of this,the future direction should focus on achieving cooperative participation and multi-stakeholder synergy at the subject level,fostering endogenous development and precise supply at the conceptual level,implementing differentiated strategies and local adaptation at the policy level,and establishing comprehensive mechanisms to protect the legitimate rights and interests of villagers at the feedback level.This approach will more effectively enhance the efficacy of digital rural governance and genuinely realize the objectives of rural revitalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177