“建设者”与“被书写者”:再论梁启超与早期中国史学史研究  

The“Builder”and the“Subject Being Written About”:Re-examining Liang Qichao and Early Studies on the History of Chinese Historiography

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:闫艳 YAN Yan(School of History,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学历史学院,北京102488

出  处:《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期28-36,共9页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘  要:20世纪20年代在域外史学理论范式大量输入情境之下,梁启超所发凡起例的以史家、史官、史著等为研究主体对象的史学史研究范式,解决了中国史学史的学科体系、研究对象等重大理论问题,影响了近代以来中国史学史撰写的形与神,甚至直接塑造了20世纪三四十年代大量史学史论著的书写概貌。而在这些论著的撰写过程中,著者除直接效仿服膺的梁启超史学史研究范式外,又同时将梁启超拣择出来,写入中国史学发展历程中。这正映射出近代学人对梁启超与中国史学史学科学术关联的多重理解,是有强烈的学术诉求。即在彼时史学家眼中,梁启超既是拥有中国史学史学科的“建设者”与“被书写者”双重身份的学科奠基者,更是一名已经具有优秀传统理论素养和与近代域外史学相抗衡的自觉意识的近代史家,肩负起了赓续传统史学使命、构建史学史体系的历史重任。In the context of a large influx of foreign historiographical paradigms during the 1920s,Liang Qichao’s pioneering paradigm for the study of the history of historiography,which focused historiographers,historians,and historical works as the main research subjects,addressed significant theoretical issues regarding the discipline system and research objects of the history of Chinese historiography.This approach influenced the form and essence of the writing of the history of Chinese historiography since modern times and directly shaped the writing style of numerous works in this field in the 1930s and 1940s.In the process of writing these works,authors not only directly followed Liang Qichao’s paradigm,but also included him as an essential figure in the development of Chinese historiography.This reflects the multiple understandings of modern scholars regarding the academic relationship between Liang Qichao and the discipline of the history of Chinese historiography and demonstrates a strong academic demand.In the eyes of historians at that time,Liang Qichao was not only the founder of the discipline of the history of Chinese historiography,possessing dual identities as both a“builder”and a“subject being written about”,but also a modern historian who,with his deep traditional theoretical background and consciousness of confronting foreign historiography,undertook the historical responsibility of continuing the mission of traditional historiography and constructing the system of the history of historiography.

关 键 词:中国近代史学 梁启超 早期中国史学史研究 

分 类 号:K092[历史地理—历史学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象