检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙裕彤 任艳青 袁军鹏 SUN Yutong;REN Yanqing;YUAN Junpeng(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,19 Yuquan Road,Shijingshan District,Beijing 100049,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市100190 [2]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市100190 [3]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京市100049
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2025年第2期144-152,共9页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
摘 要:【目的】探讨人工智能生成内容(artificial intelligence generated content,AIGC)对学术期刊出版领域的影响和挑战,并分析学术期刊出版领域应对AIGC的共识与策略,以促进AIGC在学术期刊出版领域的合理应用。【方法】从“政策规范-风险与挑战-对策建议”的逻辑思路出发,调研分析国内外学术期刊出版机构对AIGC的政策规范,围绕学术期刊出版全流程形成应对AIGC的态度倾向,剖析尚未解决的风险与挑战并提出对策建议。【结果】国内外学术期刊出版机构对于AIGC的总体态度倾向于保守性和稳妥性,虽已达成一定共识,但在使用AIGC时仍存在学术规范一致性弱、学术质量审查难、数据安全风险大、版权保护争议多等问题。【结论】学术期刊出版领域应积极拥抱AIGC带来的技术变革,推动建立共识的学术出版规范,强化内容审核,借助工具开展AIGC检测,加强关于AIGC使用边界的培训,引导AIGC的合理、透明、负责任使用,实现学术出版的智能变革与可持续发展。[Purposes]This study aims to explore the impacts and challenges of artificial intelligence generated content(AIGC)on the academic journal publishing field,and analyze the consensus and strategies of the academic journal publishing field to deal with AIGC,so as to promote the reasonable application of AIGC in the academic journal publishing field.[Methods]Starting from the logic of“policy norms-risks and challenges-countermeasures and suggestions”,we investigated and analyzed the policy norms of domestic and foreign academic journal publishers on AIGC,formed the attitude tendency to deal with AIGC around the whole publishing process of academic journal,analyzed the unresolved risks and challenges,and put forward countermeasure suggestions.[Findings]The overall attitude of domestic and foreign academic journal publishers towards AIGC tends to be conservative and prudent.Although a certain consensus has been reached,there are still some problems such as weak consistency of academic norms,difficulty in reviewing academic quality,high risk of data security,and disputes over copyright protection when using AIGC.[Conclusions]The academic journal publishing field should actively embrace the technological changes brought by AIGC,promote the establishment of consensus academic publishing norms,strengthen content review,carry out AIGC detection with tools,strengthen the training on the boundaries of the use of AIGC,and guide the reasonable,transparent,and responsible use of AIGC,so as to realize the intelligent change and sustainable development of academic publishing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.108.175