平等原则的具体化:宪法第33条第4款的释义学重构  

The Concretization of the Principle of Equality:A Hermeneutic Reconstruction of Article 33,Paragraph 4 of the Chinese Constitution

作　　者：柳建龙 Liu Jianlong

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学法学院 [2]中国社会科学院大学新时代法治创新高等研究院

出　　处：《人权》2025年第1期124-136,共13页Human Rights

基　　金：2021年国家社科基金年度项目一般项目“基本权利限制的合宪性审查方法研究”(项目编号:21BFX040)的阶段成果。

摘　　要：传统宪法理论认为,宪法第33条第4款确立了权利和义务一致性原则,然而,随着宪法理论和实践的发展,其理解发生了变迁,日益被视为平等原则的具体化,只是学说上未能作充分论证。经分析可以发现将该条款理解为“权利义务一致性说”存在制宪史上的反证、欠缺内在融贯性、宪法功能的错位等诸多问题。回归其具体背景,则可以将其作为反特权条款构成平等原则的特别注脚,由此实现本款与其他宪法条款的和谐解释。Traditional constitutional theory holds that Article 33,Paragraph 4 of the Chinese Constitution establishes the principle of the consistency of rights and obligations.However,with the evolution of constitutional theory and practice,its interpretation has shifted.It is increasingly viewed as a concretization of the principle of equality,although this perspective has not been thoroughly substantiated in in academic circles.Upon closer analysis,interpreting this provision as the“consistency of rights and obligations”reveals several issues,including counterevidence from the constitutional drafting history,a lack of internal coherence,and a misalignment with the functions of the Constitution.By revisiting the specific context of this provision,it can be understood as an antiprivilege clause,serving as a special annotation of the equality principle.This approach enables a harmonious interpretation of this provision alongside other constitutional provisions.

关 键 词：权利和义务一致性原则 平等原则 反特权 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]