检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Zijun Ke
机构地区:[1]Department of Psychology,Sun Yat-sen University,507A,Guangzhou,510006,Guangdong,China
出 处:《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》2025年第1期115-136,共22页复旦人文社会科学论丛(英文版)
基 金:supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(Grant No.2022A1515011986);National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.31700986).
摘 要:Regression estimates are biased when potential confounders are omitted or when there are other similar risks to validity.The instrumental variable(IV)method can be used instead to obtain less biased estimates or to strengthen causal inferences.One key assumption critical to the validity of the IV method is the exclusion assumption,which requires instruments to be correlated with the outcome variable only through endogenous predictors.The chi-square test of model fit is widely used as a diagnostic test for this assumption.Previous simulation studies assessed the power of this diagnostic test only in situations with strong violations of the exclusion assumption.However,low to moderate levels of assumption violation are not uncommon in reality,especially when the exclusion assumption is violated indirectly.In this study,we showed through Monte Carlo simulations that the chi-square model fit test suffered from a severe lack of power(<30%)to detect violations of the exclusion assumption when the level of violation was of typical size,and the IV causal inferences were severely inaccurate and misleading in this case.We thus advise using the IV method with caution unless there is a chance for thorough assumption diagnostics,like in meta-analyses or experiments.
关 键 词:Instrumental variable method Exclusion assumption Chi-square test of model fit Statistical power Diagnostic test
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.201.213