检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐衍兴 谢明明 TANG Yanxing;XIE Mingming(Department of Laboratory,Nanchang Xinjian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Nanchang 330100,Jiangxi,China;Department of Laboratory,Nanchang Economic and Technological Development Zone People's Hospital/Nanchang Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital Economic and TechnologicalDevelopment Zone Branch,Nanchang 330032,Jiangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]南昌市新建区疾病预防控制中心检验科,江西南昌330100 [2]南昌市经济技术开发区人民医院/南昌市中西医结合医院经开分院检验科,江西南昌330032
出 处:《医学信息》2025年第6期143-146,共4页Journal of Medical Information
摘 要:目的分析酶联免疫吸附法检测(ELISA)与快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)在梅毒检验中的应用价值。方法以2023年1月-2024年1月南昌市新建区疾病预防控制中心接诊的85例疑似梅毒患者为研究对象,依次行ELISA与RPR检测,统计两种检测方式的阳性检出率,比较ELISA与RPR在不同分期梅毒患者中的阳性检出率,分析二者在梅毒检验中的诊断效能。结果ELISA的梅毒阳性检出率高于RPR(P<0.05)。ELISA对一期、二期梅毒患者的阳性检出率高于RPR(P<0.05),但ELISA与RPR对三期梅毒患者的阳性检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ELISA在梅毒检验中的诊断准确性、敏感度、特异度高于RPR(P<0.05)。结论ELISA与RPR在梅毒检验中均具有一定价值,其中ELISA的诊断效能相对更高。Objective To analyze the application value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)and rapid plasma reagin test(RPR)in syphilis test.Methods From January 2023 to January 2024,85 patients with suspected syphilis admitted to Nanchang Xinjian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention were selected as the research objects.ELISA and RPR were performed in turn.The positive detection rates of the two detection methods were counted.The positive detection rates of ELISA and RPR in patients with different stages of syphilis were compared,and the diagnostic efficacy of the two methods in syphilis test was analyzed.Results The positive rate of syphilis in ELISA was higher than that in RPR(P<0.05).The positive detection rate of ELISA in patients with primary and secondary syphilis was higher than that of RPR(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the positive detection rate of ELISA and RPR in patients with tertiary syphilis(P>0.05).The diagnostic accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of ELISA in syphilis test were higher than those of RPR(P<0.05).Conclusion Both ELISA and RPR have certain value in syphilis test,and the diagnostic efficiency of ELISA is relatively higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38