检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨研[1] 关思思 孙婧 张目瞻 任领志 YANG Yan;GUAN Sisi;SUN Jing;ZHANG Muzhan;REN Lingzhi(Development Research Center,the Ministry of Water Resources,Beijing 100038,China;Shandong Hydrological Center,Jinan 250000,Shandong,China;North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China)
机构地区:[1]水利部发展研究中心,北京100038 [2]山东省水文中心,山东济南250000 [3]华北水利水电大学,河南郑州450045
出 处:《水利发展研究》2025年第3期32-36,共5页Water Resources Development Research
摘 要:近年来,地方经济社会高质量发展对水文工作提出了更多需求和更大挑战。对标对表新形势新要求,水文管理体制还存在一些差距,亟需进一步深化水文体制改革、创新管理模式。文章综合采用文献分析、实地调研、座谈交流等方法,梳理总结国家机构改革政策要求和地方水文部门改革实践方向,对比分析垂直管理、属地管理、双重管理等我国现行水文管理典型模式的优势与不足,科学研判水文体制改革趋势,提出有关对策建议,为进一步深化水文体制改革提供参考。In recent years,the high quality development of local economy and society has brought more demands and greater challenges to hydrological work.In view of the new situation and new requirements,there are still some gaps in the hydrological management system.It is urgent to further deepen the reform of the hydrological system and innovate the management model.By using the methods of literature analysis,field research and discussion,this article summarizes the policy guidance of national institution reform and the practical direction of local hydrology reform,compares and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the current typical models of hydrology management such as vertical management,dependency management and dual management,studies the trend of hydrology system reform scientifically,and puts forward relevant measures and suggestions.It points out the focus of work and breakthrough direction for further deepening the reform of hydrological system.
分 类 号:G322.0[文化科学] TV213.4[水利工程—水文学及水资源]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.61.200