检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高福顺[1] Gao Fushun
出 处:《中国边疆史地研究》2025年第1期42-56,213,共16页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
摘 要:辽、宋分别作为中国北疆游牧族群与中原农耕族群建立的政权,他们的分立割据是中国古史谱系演进过程中的重要阶段。在此过程中,辽宋双方始终寻求打破对峙状态以获取天下“共主”的历史地位,追求“华夷一统”的文化认同与政治认同,努力将自身政权塑造为中国古史谱系中具有正统地位的形象。“华夷一统”的内聚性特征始终贯穿于辽宋“战”与“和”的历史演进主线当中。辽宋“战”与“和”的历史演进变奏及其所体现的传统儒家思想文化之“大一统”内涵,亦为中国学界批判西方某些学者罔顾古代中国统一多民族国家发展演变的历史事实所提出的学术理论或研究范式提供了案例。The Liao and Song dynasties,established respectively by the nomadic tribes of China's northern borderland and the agrarian communities of the Central Plains,represented a crucial phase in the evolution of China's historical lineage.Throughout this period of division,both the Liao and Song sought to break the stalemate and assert their claim to the historical status of the“common universal ruler(共主),”striving for cultural and political unity under the concept of“Hua-Yi Yitong(华夷一统)”.Each aimed to establish its rule as an integral part of China's historical lineage and rightful successor to the tradition of centralized governance.The intrinsic cohesion of the Hua-Yi Yitong principle remained a central theme in the historical trajectory of war and peace between the Liao and Song dynasties.The evolving dynamics of their conflicts and reconciliations,alongside their reflection of the Confucian ideal of Da Yitong(大一统,Great Unity),provide a compelling case study for Chinese scholars to critique certain Western academic theories or paradigms that overlook the historical realities of ancient China's development as a unified multi-ethnic state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158