经史之间:王国维“二重证据法”之内涵及其转换  

Classics and History:A Study of Dual Attestation Suggested by Wang Guowei

作　　者：许超杰 XU Chaojie

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院历史系,410082

出　　处：《史林》2025年第1期153-162,219,220,共12页Historical Review

基　　金：国家社科基金冷门绝学研究专项“《穀梁》经传汇校集注疏证”(23VJXG008)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：王国维“二重证据法”是近代最为重要的文史研究方法之一。学界多将“二重证据法”的提出指向1925年清华研究院之《古史新证》讲义。事实上,1913年,王国维已于《明堂寝庙通考》中提出“二重证明法”。“二重证明法”与“二重证据法”在方法上具有一致性,即以出土新材料与传世文献互证。但就其内涵而言,却存在很大差别。“二重证明法”与“二重证据法”一字之别及其不同论述,实为王国维学术理念转变之表征,昭示王国维由批判泥古而走向信古。就研究方法而言,其“二重证据法”为近代“新史学”开创了一种研究“范式”;但就其自身的学术理念而言,却仍是在赓续清代小学、经学之传统,而以“经世”自任,即王国维之学术仍处于经史之间。The present paper,disagreeing with the popular idea that Wang Guowei's dual attestation should be traced back to Wang's 1925 lecture notes known as Gushi xinzheng,contends that,as early as 1913,Wang had proposed the dual demonstration in Mingtang qinmiao tongkao,and that the dual attestation and the dual demonstration were methodologically similar to each other while having very different meanings,of which were worthy of much-furthered differentiation and discussion.

关 键 词：王国维 二重证据法 二重证明法 经史之学 经世 

分 类 号：K061[历史地理—历史学]