自反性主题分析法报告指南解读及思考  

Interpretation and insights of the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines

作　　者：吴燕铭 周雨欣 张玉[3] 金园园 Wu Yanming;Zhou Yuxin;Zhang Yu;Jin Yuanyuan(School of Nursing,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030000,China)

机构地区：[1]山西医科大学护理学院,山西太原030000 [2]伦敦国王学院西西里桑德斯研究所 [3]苏州大学苏州医学院护理学院

出　　处：《护理学杂志》2025年第5期79-84,共6页Journal of Nursing Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(72304202);江苏省自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(BK20230492)。

摘　　要：自反性主题分析法具有较强的灵活性及解释性,为深入探讨护理领域的多元现象提供了新的理论视角和研究路径。本文介绍自反性主题分析法报告指南(Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines,RTARG)的发展背景、内容、优势及局限性等,旨在为国内质性研究提供报告规范,提高自反性主题分析法报告的透明度和可信度,推动护理学科质性研究的高质量发展。The reflexive thematic analysis(RTA)is highly flexible and interpretative,providing a new theoretical perspective and research approach for the in-depth exploration of diverse phenomena in the nursing field.This paper introduces the development background,contents,strengths,and limitations of the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines(RTARG),aiming to provide reporting standards for qualitative research in China,to improve the transparency and credibility of RTARG reports,and to promote the high-quality development of qualitative research in nursing discipline.

关 键 词：质性研究 主题分析法 自反性主题分析法 报告指南 报告规范 护理研究 

分 类 号：R471[医药卫生—护理学]