检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱秀媛 罗宇茵 叶琴 刘宁 Zhu Xiuyuan;Luo Yuyin;Ye Qin;Liu Ning(Department of Nursing,Zhuhai Campus,Zunyi Medical University,Zhuhai 519041,China)
机构地区:[1]遵义医科大学珠海校区护理学系,广东珠海519041 [2]遵义医科大学珠海校区基础部全科医学基础教研室,广东珠海519041
出 处:《护理学杂志》2025年第5期114-120,共7页Journal of Nursing Science
基 金:贵州省研究生教育教学改革重点课题(黔教合YJSJGKT[2021]034);遵义医科大学研究生教育教学改革与研究课题项目(ZYK95);遵义医科大学教育教学改革计划项目(XJJG2021-37)。
摘 要:目的总结并分析医学模拟教育中复盘教学评估工具的内容、开发过程、特点以及应用情况,为我国医学教学领域复盘评估工具的选用提供借鉴。方法采用JBI范围综述指南为方法学框架,系统检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、Embase、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science,检索时限为从建库至2023年11月1日。根据纳入、排除标准筛选文献。结果最终纳入21篇全文文献,共涉及8种复盘教学评估工具,其中10篇关于评估工具的开发,11篇关于评估工具的验证。常用工具主要为医学模拟复盘评价量表、客观结构化复盘评估工具、医学模拟教育追溯评级工具、实时复盘评估工具、同行复盘评估工具、复盘体验量表、引导者胜任力评价量表、有意义学习复盘评估量表。结论模拟医学教育中针对复盘技能的评估工具种类多样,建议护理教育工作者全面考量和评估我国国情结合相关教学情景,合理选择评估工具,以促进有效和高质量的医学模拟教育复盘教学活动。Objective To summarize and analyze the content,development process,characteristics and application of debriefing assessment tools in medical simulation-based education,and provide reference for the selection of debriefing assessment tools in the field of medical education in China.Methods The JBI scoping review guideline was used as the methodological framework,and the CNKI,Wanfang Database,VIP.com,SinoMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,PubMed,and Web of Science were systematically searched from the establishment of the database to November 1,2023.Literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results A total of 21 full-text articles were included,involving 8 debriefing assessment tools,In these 21 articles,10 were about the development of tools and 11 were about the validation of tools.Commonly used tools were mainly Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare(DASH),Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing(OSAD),Simulation in Healthcare retrOaction Rating Tool(SHORT),Debriefing Assessment in Real Time(DART),Peer-Assessment Debriefing Instrument(PADI),Debriefing Experience Scale(DES),Facilitator Competency Rubric(FCR),Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Evaluation Scale(DMLES)and so on.Conclusion There are various types of assessment tools for review skills in simulated-based medical education.It is recommended that nursing educators comprehensively consider and evaluate my country′s national conditions and combine relevant teaching scenarios to reasonably select assessment tools to promote effective and high-quality medical simulation education review teaching activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49