检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周立波 ZHOU Li-bo
机构地区:[1]广东海洋大学法政学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第3期43-48,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
基 金:2021年度广东海洋大学科研启动项目“新文科视域下诉讼法学前沿问题研究”(2021kyqd001)。
摘 要:行政处罚越权现象频发,具体表现为横向、纵向、程序与内容越权及无权限越权,其根源在于法律规范模糊性、自由裁量权滥用、执法人员素质不足、社会监督缺位及技术监控异化。结合典型案例,针对此类越权行为对公民权益与法治权威的侵蚀,需强化立法监督以明确职权边界,推进执法队伍专业化建设,完善信息公开与社会监督机制,加强司法审查对行政行为的合法性制约等,通过系统性改革,实现行政处罚的规范化,平衡执法力度与温度,维护社会公平正义。The phenomenon of overstepping authority in administrative penalties occurs frequently,manifesting in horizontal,vertical,procedural,and substantive overreach,as well as unauthorized actions.The root causes lie in the ambiguity of legal norms,abuse of discretionary power,insufficient qualifications of law enforcement person-nel,lack of social oversight,and the distortion of technical monitoring.By analyzing typical cases,how such over-reach erodes citizens’rights and the authority of the rule of law are addressed.It emphasizes the need to strengthen legislative oversight to clarify the boundaries of authority,promote the professionalization of law enforcement teams,improve information disclosure and social supervision mechanisms,and enhance judicial review to constrain the le-gality of administrative actions.Through systemic reforms,the aim is to standardize administrative penalties,bal-ance the rigor and humanity of law enforcement,and uphold social fairness and justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49