sRPE监控优秀越野滑雪运动员训练负荷的应用研究  

Application of sRPE in Monitoring Training Load of Elite Cross-Country Skiers

作　　者：尹一全 杨圣洁 孟庆军 邱招义[1] 崔明坤 YIN Yiquan;YANG Shengjie;MENG Qingjun;QIU Zhaoyi;CUI Mingkun(China Winter Sports College,Beijing Sport Univ.,Beijing 100084,China;Mountaineering Sports Management Center,General Administration of Sport of China,Beijing 1000763,China;School of Education,Beijing Sport Univ.,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学中国冰雪运动学院,北京100084 [2]国家体育总局登山运动管理中心,北京100763 [3]北京体育大学教育学院,北京100084

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2025年第3期87-94,共8页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助课题;国家体育总局运动训练重点实验室项目(2024YDXL001)。

摘　　要：目的:基于我国某越野滑雪专业队伍连续观测累积的主客观负荷数据,检验sRPE表征不同类型(强度及持续时长)训练课负荷的可靠性并探讨其训练应用。方法:以我国某越野滑雪国家集训队10名一级以上水平运动员为实验对象,分别采集273节不同类型训练课的强度、时长、运动员sRPE和教练员的sRPE推测值(C-sRPE),采用回归分析等统计学方法进行数据分析。结果:(1)sRPE与TRIMP之间相关性显著(r=0.68,P<0.001),其中LIT组sRPE与TRIMP呈强相关(r=0.70,P<0.001),MIT与HIT组sRPE与TRIMP呈中等程度相关(r=0.46、r=0.31,P<0.001);(2)在LIT组三种不同时间长度样本中(0~60 min、60~120 min和120~180 min),sRPE与TRIMP均有较强的相关关系且差异较小,(r=0.70、r=0.67、r=0.69,P<0.001);(3)不同强度训练的sRPE与C-sRPE皆有非常显著的相关性(P<0.001),且配对样本T检验不具有显著差异(P<0.05);(4)C-sRPE和sRPE的差值与训练强度之间有显著的正相关关系(P<0.05)。结论与建议:sRPE表征耐力训练课负荷可靠,用于LIT训练课最优。在sRPE与TRIMP的换算关系方面,LIT的持续时间不会影响换算关系,但HIT训练课的换算关系与其他强度有差异。教练员对运动员的sRPE估计准确,但对LIT和HIT的估计有相反的偏差。建议将测量教练员C-sRPE的流程融入队伍的管理机制中,用于校准教练员对运动员主观负荷的判断,此外谨慎使用sRPE记录高强度训练课负荷。This study used the data samples formed by continuous observations of a certain professional cross-country skiing team in China to test the effectiveness of sRPE in representing different types(intensity and duration)of training sessions,and explored its application in training.Ten first level or above athletes from a national cross-country skiing training team in China were selected as experimental subjects.The intensity,duration,sRPE of athletes,and estimated sRPE(C-sRPE)values of coaches from 273 different types of training courses were collected,and statistical methods such as regression analysis were used for data analysis.Results:(1)There was a significant correlation between sRPE and TRIMP(r=0.68,P<0.001),with a strong correlation between sRPE and TRIMP in the LIT group(r=0.70,P<0.001),and a moderate correlation between sRPE and TRIMP in the MIT and HIT groups(r=0.46,r=0.31,P<0.001).(2)Among the three different time length samples in the LIT group(0~60 minutes,60~120 minutes,and 120~180 minutes),sRPE and TRIMP had a strong correlation with relatively small differences(r=0.70,r=0.67,r=0.69,P<0.001).(3)sRPE trained at different intensities showed a very significant correlation with C-sRPE(P<0.001),and paired sample T tests did not show significant differences(P<0.05).(4)The difference between C-sRPE and sRPE was significantly positively correlated with training intensity(P<0.05).Conclusion and suggestions:sRPE is a reliable indicator of training load for endurance sessions and is optimal for LIT(low intensity training)sessions.In terms of the conversion between sRPE and TRIMP,the duration of LIT sessions does not affect this conversion;however,the conversion for HIT(high intensity training)sessions differs from that of other intensities.Coaches estimated athletes’sRPE accurately,but had opposing biases when estimating LIT and HIT.It is recommended to incorporate the process of measuring coaches’C-sRPE into team management systems to help calibrate coaches’judgments of athletes’perceived load.Addition

关 键 词：耐力项目 越野滑雪 训练冲量 主观感觉努力程度 课时RPE 训练负荷 

分 类 号：G863.13[文化科学—体育训练] G808.16[文化科学—体育学]