《点绛唇·新月娟娟》考论  

On Rouged Lips·Xinyue Juanjuan

作　　者：郝艳 HAO Yan(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Center China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学文学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《湖北文理学院学报》2025年第3期55-61,共7页Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science

摘　　要：《点绛唇·新月娟娟》一词的作者历来存在较大争议,主要有苏过、汪藻、不著名氏三种说法。此词的作者之争始自宋代,至明清诸家的著录中仍呈现三种说法并存的情况。清代沈雄、张宗橚、吴长元、沈涛等人对此词作者进行了一定程度的考证,讨论中心大致在苏过、汪藻二人之间,作者之争尚未盖棺定论。宋代黄公度《知稼翁集》中的黄沃跋语可以证实《点绛唇·新月娟娟》的作者为汪藻。考察该词的著录情况,可知误题苏过为作者始于宋代杨湜的《古今词话》。后来诸如杨慎《词品》、沈雄《古今词话》等书在著录时沿用前说,并未深考,以致承续谬误。There are three different opinions about the author of Rouged Lips·Xinyue Juanjuan:Su Guo,Wang Zao,and anonymity.The debate about the author began in the Song Dynasty.Until the Ming and Qing Dynasties,these three different opinions still existed.In the Qing Dynasty,Shen Xiong,Zhang Zongsu,Wu Changyuan and Shen Tao did some research,but they did not reach an agreement on the authorship,with focus on Su Guo and Wang Zao.Huang Wo’s words recorded in Huang Gongdu’s Collection named Zhi Jia Weng Ji in the Song Dynasty,which can confirm that the author should be Wang Zao.We can know that the erroneous opinions that Su Guo is the author began with Yang Shi’s book named Gujin Ci Hua in the Song Dynasty.Yang Shen’s Ci Pin,Shen Xiong’s Gujin Ci Hua and other books heedlessly copy the previous views,giving rise to continuous mistakes.

关 键 词：《点绛唇·新月娟娟》 苏过 汪藻 

分 类 号：K207.8[历史地理—历史学]