安徽中烟郴州基地单元主栽品种质量评价  

Quality Evaluation of Main Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Chenzhou Base Unit of China Tobacco Anhui Industrial Co.,Ltd.

作　　者：张福建[1] 唐经祥[2] 谭志鹏 徐经年[2] 李思军 朱俊俊 汪升友 郭飞 任四海[2] ZHANG Fu-jian;TANG Jing-xiang;TAN Zhi-peng(China Tobacco Anhui Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Hefei,Anhui 230088;Institute of Tobacco Science,Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hefei,Anhui 230001;Chenzhou Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company,Chenzhou,Hunan 423002)

机构地区：[1]安徽中烟工业有限责任公司,安徽合肥230088 [2]安徽省农业科学院烟草研究所,安徽合肥230001 [3]湖南省烟草公司郴州市公司,湖南郴州423002

出　　处：《安徽农业科学》2025年第6期17-20,24,共5页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：安徽中烟基地技术服务(2023340000340025)。

摘　　要：为了解安徽中烟郴州基地单元内主栽品种的质量,2023年在郴州市桂阳县和平镇开展品种大区对比试验。结果表明,湘烟7号、湘烟6号生育期分别较云烟87长11、8 d;田间长势以湘烟7号表现最好,较云烟87株高高9.95%、有效叶片数多18.80%、茎围粗6.24%、节距长13.79%,湘烟6号茎围较粗(较云烟87粗8.42%),云烟116烟叶较宽(较云烟87宽15.90%);经济性状也以湘烟7号表现最好,较云烟87均价高3.71%、产量高4.62%、产值高8.52%、上等烟比例高6.08%,湘烟6号、云烟116经济性状略优于云烟87;湘烟7号、湘烟6号及云烟116的中、下部烟外观不如云烟87,但上部叶外观皆优于云烟87;总体化学成分的协调性及感官质量和云烟87有差距,3个品种间,以湘烟7号表现略好。To understand the quality of main varieties in Chenzhou base unit of Anhui China Tobacco Industrial Co.,Ltd.,a regional comparative experiment of varieties was carried in Heping Town of Guiyang County of Chenzhou City in 2023.The results showed the growth period of Xiangyan 7 and Xiangyan 6 was 11 days and 8 days respectively longer than that of Yunyan 87.Xiangyan 7 showed the best growth in the field,compared with Yunyan 87,the height was 9.95%higher,the effective leaves was 18.80%more,the stem circumference was 6.24%thicker,the pitch was 13.79%longer.Xiangyan 6’s stem circumference was 8.42%thicker than Yunyan 87,Yunyan 116 leaf width was 15.90%wider than Yunyan 87.Xiangyan 7’s economic traits also performed the best,compared with Yunyan 87,the average price,the yield,the output value and the superior leaves was 3.71%,4.62%,8.52%and 6.08%higher respectively.Xiangyan 6 and Yunyan 116’s economic traits were somewhat better than Yunyan 87.The appearances of the middle and lower parts of Xiangyan 7,Xiangyan 6,and Yunyan 116 were worse than Yunyan 87,but the appearances of the upper leaves were contrary,and some disparity in overall chemical composition’s coordination and sensory quality compared to Yunyan 87.Xiangyan 7 performed slightly better than Xiangyan 6 and Yunyan 116.

关 键 词：主栽品种 烤烟 质量评价 郴州 

分 类 号：S572[农业科学—烟草工业] S338[农业科学—作物学]