中国刑法学自主性的基本面向与发展前景  

The Autonomy of Criminal Law in China:Basic Orientation and Development Prospects

作　　者：周光权 Zhou Guangquan

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期175-187,238,239,共15页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：进入21世纪以来,中国刑法学的知识自主性呈现通过体系性思考确立刑法基本立场,对司法实践予以持续关注,保持理论的反思能力和批判精神三个面向,在切实贯彻罪刑法定原则,建构合理的犯罪论体系,以及深化过失论、共犯论、罪数论、量刑论、具体犯罪认定等研究方面取得重大进展,理论研究空前深入,为满足社会治理的现实需要提供了理论资源。是否使用国外刑法学的某一术语,不是判断我国知识是否自主的唯一尺度,对司法难题的妥当解决才是关键;层出不穷的疑难案件决定了我国刑法理论的底色只能是实践性、功能性的,而不是纯规范论的自洽体系建构。我国刑法研究已经能够在活生生的司法实践中发现法律人的本土智慧,寻找理论发展的契机,而不是生搬硬套国外的理论。刑法学的未来发展应当继续坚持其教义学方向,既不需要纯理的推演型思考,也不宜提倡表格化的刑法“学派之争”。刑法学知识体系必须顾及实务的思维逻辑,继续推动刑法的功能主义转向,在过失犯、共犯论和量刑论等领域持续发力,立足于裁判展开深入研究,同时保持理论的反思能力,以建构更加富有解释穿透力的知识体系。Since the new century,the intellectual autonomy of China’s criminal law has shown three features:establishing the basic position of criminal law through systematic thinking,paying continuous attention to judicial practice,and maintaining the ability of reflection and critical spirit of theory.It has made significant progress in effectively implementing the principle of legally prescribed crimes for crimes and punishments,building a reasonable criminal theory system,and deepening research on the theory of negligence,accomplice theory,number theory of crime,sentencing theory,and identification of specific crimes.Theoretical research has been unprecedently active,providing rich resources to meet the practical needs of social governance,and high-level theoretical accumulation also provides an opportunity to review the past and look forward to the future.The main characteristics of the autonomy of criminal law in China include grasping criminal law in the sense of ontology as much as possible rather than in the sense of pure reason;taking substantive and value judgments into account in criminal law theory;considering the principle of illegality judgment in the general theory of criminal law together with the determination of individual crimes;solving China’s problem as the ultimate goal even if we borrow theoretical terms from other countries.Therefore,whether to use a certain term from foreign criminal law is not the only criterion for judging whether our country’s knowledge is autonomous.What matters is the proper solution to judicial problems.The endless emergence of difficult cases determines that China’s criminal law theory can only be constructed on a practical and functional basis,instead of building a self-consistent system based on purely normative theory.Criminal law aims to resolve extreme social conflicts,and it is the mission of scholars to attach importance to the practical rationality of theory.China’s criminal law research has been able to discover the local wisdom of legal persons in living

关 键 词：中国刑法学 犯罪论体系 实践导向 刑法谦抑性 自主知识体系 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]