论重大飞行事故的判断方法  

On Judgment Method for Major Aviation Accidents

作　　者：张莉琼[1] 肖长睿 ZHANG Liqiong;XIAO Changrui(Research Base of Air Law and Policy,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China)

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学航空法律与政策研究中心,天津300300

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期86-94,共9页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：天津市普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地“中国民航大学航空法律与政策研究中心”开放式基金项目(HK2019YB02);中国民航大学研究生科研创新项目(2021YJS029)。

摘　　要：可理解性、预测可能性和可经司法审查性的三级逐层排除阶梯式方法是重大飞行事故罪是否符合明确性原则的判断方法。可理解性和预测可能性的缺失使得重大飞行事故的判断方法成为中国刑法理论和实务中的难题,应当在凯尔森实证法学派的基础上,按照合规范性、合刑性和合宪性的位阶顺序逐层深入对“重大飞行事故”进行解释,重大飞行事故应作为客观的结果要素被解释为“5 000万元以上直接经济损失”,“造成严重后果”应作为内在客观处罚条件被解释为“50人以上重伤”。The ladder method of three-level step-by-step exclusion,involving understanding possibility,predicting possibility,and confirming through judicial reviews,is a method to judge whether the crime of a major aviation accident complies with the principle of clarity.The lack of understanding and predicting possibilities makes the judgment of major aviation accidents a challenging issue in the criminal law theory and practice in China.Based on Kelsen’s positive law,this paper explains“major aviation accidents”by levels,following the order of standardization,criminality and constitutionality.Major aviation accidents should be interpreted as an objective result element,referring to“direct economic loss of 50 million yuan or more”,while“causing serious consequences”is an internal objective punishment condition,referring to“serious injury to 50 people or more”.

关 键 词：重大飞行事故 造成严重后果 明确性原则 刑法解释位阶 内在客观处罚条件 

分 类 号：DF934[政治法律—国际法学] DF622[政治法律—法学]